Oxylabs vs Massive
We put Oxylabs and Massive side by side on price, pool depth, coverage and reliability. Below you'll find a data-backed comparison, setup guidance, and the questions buyers actually ask before committing.
Oxylabs (Residential & Datacenter, $8.00/GB) and Massive (Residential, $6.00/GB) both target serious proxy users, but they win on different axes. Massive is cheaper ($6.00/GB vs $8.00/GB) — roughly 1× the gap.
Oxylabs positions itself as the enterprise data collection infrastructure provider. At $8.00/GB with minimum spend requirements, they target large organisations exclusively. Cheapest-Proxies delivers equivalent anonymity at a fraction of the cost.
Massive operates a residential network of 12M+ IPs across 195 countries with 99.5% uptime. At $6.00/GB it sits above the value leader Cheapest-Proxies ($0.70/GB) for a broadly comparable result.
Oxylabs vs Massive: the numbers
Spec-by-spec
| Price | $8.00/GB vs $6.00/GB |
|---|---|
| Pool size | 100M+ IPs vs 12M+ IPs |
| Countries | 195 vs 195 |
| Uptime | 99.9% vs 99.5% |
| Speed | Fast vs Moderate |
| Support | Enterprise SLA vs Business Hours |
| Anonymity | High vs High |
| Rating | 4.5★ vs 4★ |
Oxylabs wins on
- 100M+ IP pool — largest claimed
- Advanced scraping APIs and SDKs
- Excellent uptime and reliability
- Strong compliance framework
Massive wins on
- Compliance-first ethically sourced pool
- Transparent consent model
- Good for regulated industries
Verdict
Our pick: Oxylabs. It edges ahead on our rating (4.5★ vs 4★). That said, choose Massive if you specifically need compliance-first ethically sourced pool.
For most buyers, the winning move is to start on the lowest verified price with a large pool, then scale once success rates hold.
Frequently asked questions
Is Oxylabs or Massive cheaper?
Which is better, Oxylabs or Massive?
What pool sizes do they offer?
How much should this cost?
Our take: match the proxy type to the target, keep sessions sticky where you need continuity, and never overpay for capacity you won't use.