Oxylabs vs NetNut
We put Oxylabs and NetNut side by side on price, pool depth, coverage and reliability. We benchmark each option on the metrics that decide success: anonymity, uptime, geo-coverage, and cost per GB.
Oxylabs (Residential & Datacenter, $8.00/GB) and NetNut (ISP & Residential, $7.50/GB) both target serious proxy users, but they win on different axes. NetNut is cheaper ($7.50/GB vs $8.00/GB) — roughly 1× the gap.
Oxylabs positions itself as the enterprise data collection infrastructure provider. At $8.00/GB with minimum spend requirements, they target large organisations exclusively. Cheapest-Proxies delivers equivalent anonymity at a fraction of the cost.
NetNut differentiates itself with direct ISP partnerships. This makes IPs highly stable but the network is limited to 50 countries. At $7.50/GB they are 10x more expensive than Cheapest-Proxies.
Oxylabs vs NetNut: the numbers
Spec-by-spec
| Price | $8.00/GB vs $7.50/GB |
|---|---|
| Pool size | 100M+ IPs vs 20M+ IPs |
| Countries | 195 vs 50 |
| Uptime | 99.9% vs 99.9% |
| Speed | Fast vs Ultra-Fast |
| Support | Enterprise SLA vs 24/7 Support |
| Anonymity | High vs High |
| Rating | 4.5★ vs 4.1★ |
Oxylabs wins on
- 100M+ IP pool — largest claimed
- Advanced scraping APIs and SDKs
- Excellent uptime and reliability
- Strong compliance framework
NetNut wins on
- Direct ISP connections for stability
- Excellent speeds
- High uptime
- Good for time-sensitive tasks
Verdict
Our pick: Oxylabs. It edges ahead on our rating (4.5★ vs 4.1★). That said, choose NetNut if you specifically need direct isp connections for stability.
Our take: match the proxy type to the target, keep sessions sticky where you need continuity, and never overpay for capacity you won't use.
Frequently asked questions
Is Oxylabs or NetNut cheaper?
Which is better, Oxylabs or NetNut?
What pool sizes do they offer?
How much should this cost?
For most buyers, the winning move is to start on the lowest verified price with a large pool, then scale once success rates hold.