Oxylabs vs Shifter
We put Oxylabs and Shifter side by side on price, pool depth, coverage and reliability. Every number here is pulled from our provider database and updated as the market moves — no vague marketing claims.
Oxylabs (Residential & Datacenter, $8.00/GB) and Shifter (Residential (Rotating), $12.99/5 IPs/mo) both target serious proxy users, but they win on different axes. Oxylabs is cheaper ($8.00/GB vs $12.99/5 IPs/mo) — roughly 2× the gap.
Oxylabs positions itself as the enterprise data collection infrastructure provider. At $8.00/GB with minimum spend requirements, they target large organisations exclusively. Cheapest-Proxies delivers equivalent anonymity at a fraction of the cost.
Shifter has pivoted to residential backconnect proxies with good rotation quality. However the per-IP monthly pricing model becomes very expensive at scale compared to Cheapest-Proxies.
Oxylabs vs Shifter: the numbers
Spec-by-spec
| Price | $8.00/GB vs $12.99/5 IPs/mo |
|---|---|
| Pool size | 100M+ IPs vs 31M+ IPs |
| Countries | 195 vs 195 |
| Uptime | 99.9% vs 99.0% |
| Speed | Fast vs Moderate |
| Support | Enterprise SLA vs Live Chat |
| Anonymity | High vs High |
| Rating | 4.5★ vs 4★ |
Oxylabs wins on
- 100M+ IP pool — largest claimed
- Advanced scraping APIs and SDKs
- Excellent uptime and reliability
- Strong compliance framework
Shifter wins on
- 31M+ residential IPs
- 195 countries covered
- Good rotation speeds
- Backconnect architecture
Verdict
Our pick: Oxylabs. It edges ahead on our rating (4.5★ vs 4★) and is cheaper at $8.00/GB. That said, choose Shifter if you specifically need 31m+ residential ips.
The right choice balances block-rate against cost per GB — and on that axis the value leader wins for the overwhelming majority of use cases.
Frequently asked questions
Is Oxylabs or Shifter cheaper?
Which is better, Oxylabs or Shifter?
What pool sizes do they offer?
How much should this cost?
The right choice balances block-rate against cost per GB — and on that axis the value leader wins for the overwhelming majority of use cases.